Connect with us

California Literary Review

Denial of Death by Ernest Becker


Denial of Death by Ernest Becker

According to Becker, man is torn between his symbolic, self-conscious awareness and his animal nature. The same creature that names himself, imagines, explores and speculates is in the end, food for insects.

Denial of Death by Ernest Becker 1
Denial of Death
by Ernest Becker
Free Press 336 pp.
CLR [rating:5]

The Worm At The Core

The fact is that this is what society is and always has been…a structure of statuses and roles, customs and rules for behavior, designed to serve as a vehicle for earthly heroism…from the “high” heroism of a Churchill, a Mao, or a Buddha, to the “low” heroism of the coal miner, the peasant, the simple priest; the plain everyday earthly heroism wrought by gnarled working hands guiding a family through hunger and disease.

“The Denial of Death” recently turned up on Bill Clinton’s list of 20 favorite books. The winner of the Pulitzer Prize in 1974, one hopes that every generation a mention such as this will bring this brilliant book to the attention of new readers.

According to Becker, man is torn between his symbolic, self-conscious awareness and his animal nature. The same creature that names himself, imagines, explores and speculates is in the end, food for insects. How a man deals with this can explain everything from individual neuroses to the Holocaust. It is what William James called “the worm at the core” of man’s existence. Anality is viewed as an attempt to deny the possibility of accident or death, to insist on our separation from nature. Members of the primitive Chagga tribe wear an anal plug their entire lives. Modern society, of course, goes to elaborate lengths to imagine a separation from natural reality. The resulting tension expresses itself in a Swift poem:

Nor wonder how I lost my Wits;
Oh! Caelia, Caelia, Caelia shits!

So man is afraid, but where does he turn? He’s simply not strong enough to go it alone. To quote Maslow: “We enjoy and even thrill to the godlike possibilities we see in ourselves…and yet we simultaneously shiver with weakness, awe, and fear before these very same possibilities.” So we as individuals and society create intoxicating illusions in which to lose ourselves. The brave few that try to get beyond our secure societal roles find the same emptiness, fear, and anxiety as that of the psychotic. To quote Jack Nicholson as Col. Nathan R. Jessup: “The truth? Do you want the truth? You can’t handle the truth!” Enter Kierkegaard.

Beck considers Kierkegaard’s insight into the human condition to be so accomplished that his 1840s writings should be considered “post-Freudian,” particularly his understanding of the causes of repression and its devastating effects. One can close up, obsess, collect bottle caps, do whatever it takes to allay our fear. One can also detach from the body, taste the infinite and become God joining other schizophrenics in pushing a shopping cart down a city street. Or finally, we can as Martin Luther put it “taste death as though it were present,” kill off our illusions and admit that we are the creature. Only then according to Kierkegaard can we see beyond to “absolute transcendence, to the Ultimate Power of Creation.” One breaks the illusions of cultural heroism, and through faith, aligns oneself with the infinite and in a sense cosmic heroism.

In Kierkegaard, psychology, and religion, philosophy and science, poetry and truth merge indistinguishably together in the yearning of the creature.

If Kierkegaard is to be viewed as the hero of Becker’s story, Freud is seen as a tragically flawed genius. While most of us suppress our fears with societal roles and customs, the genius can attempt a sui generis project that in the creator’s mind will fundamentally change the world and secure his immortality. In Becker’s view, Freud clung tightly to this role, which explains his bitterness when others, particularly Jung, challenged his work. Psychoanalysis became in effect Freud’s “private religion.” His life becomes a symbol of the failures and limits of worldly heroism. But Freud’s contributions, particularly in group psychology, cannot be overestimated. An individual’s identification with the hero-leader allows him or her to become the omnipotent infant once again. All the individual’s moral decisions and responsibilities are transferred to the hero-leader. The consequences from Hitler to Charles Manson to Mao are all too familiar to us. The ensuing carnage is not a reflection of man’s strength, but rather a man “trying to affirm in a cowardly way his feeble powers.”

So what can we do? We can downsize or fetishize the world into a manageable size. We can dedicate our lives to creating a masterpiece that establishes our “immortality.” We can hold tightly to nationalism or a rock star or Marxism. To Becker’s credit, he doesn’t provide “the Answer,” just some clues as to when we’re on the wrong path and why we’ve chosen it. He understands the need for myths. He understands the devastating results of separating science from all moral or religious contexts. Joseph Campbell stated that the world is changing too fast for us to cultivate and sustain mythology. Writers like Becker are seedlings on a barren social landscape. We need to nurture them.

Continue Reading
You may also like...

Mike is the Editor of the California Literary Review. FaceBook I also run a couple more sites. Net Worth Yoga Flaxseed Oil Quotes and Memes List of Banks Wordpress Tricks Steel Buildings, Structures, and Bridges



  1. Gregg Cherrington-Kelly

    June 13, 2012 at 7:40 pm

    Thanks everybody for your commnets.
    Good news! I have recently located audio tapes of this lecture series. When I get them, I will see if they can be published. I am still looking for the video tapes..but of course in 1972 we didn’t have cell phones, VCR’s and digital cameras, ETC. How did wee ever get by without this stuff? Any interest out there? How do I get in touch with the Seattle foundation?
    G. Cherrington-Kelly

  2. Rob

    October 17, 2011 at 4:42 pm

    The CBC tapes should fascinating. Please let me know how I can gain access to them. Thank you for your help.

  3. Wale Olajide

    April 18, 2011 at 11:06 am

    What a useful resource.I certainly will love to see the CBC tapes or the transcript if available as they certainly will be most useful to my cross-cultural work in existential philosophy.Please consider and thank you for being an excellent curator.

  4. Stephanie

    January 11, 2010 at 6:59 pm


    I’m not sure if you will check this, but I wanted to know if you were ever able to get copy of the CBC tapes. I’m working on a documentary that includes information about Becker and would love to see them. Please email me at [email protected] if you have any information.

    Thanks so much!

  5. Jeff McKean

    May 14, 2009 at 10:19 am

    Hi Greg,

    I would also love to see “Dialogue on Man”. Please let me know if you are able to get ahold of thsoe tapes!

    [email protected]

  6. Kerry Skalsky

    April 8, 2009 at 7:14 pm

    I am writing from the Ernest Becker Foundation in Seattle, Washington. Would love very much to get a copy of the “Dialogue on Man” lecture with Mr. Becker and Fulton Fisher. Please advise how I may do this and thanks for any help.

  7. Jeffrey S.

    December 20, 2008 at 6:00 pm

    I would also love to see the CBC Lectures. Please contact me at [email protected]

  8. Michelle Bell

    November 14, 2008 at 10:44 pm

    I often ask learned people if they have read “Denial of Death.” I used the book a lot in my last few masters courses in history. It would be such a thrill if you had a way to pass on the CBC tapes or files. I would love to see them. How great for you to have been there!

  9. Dan_the_man

    May 20, 2008 at 9:42 am


    I would love to see that. If you have the files, please email me at synaesthete at gmail dot com.

  10. Gregg Cherrington-Kelly

    May 18, 2008 at 10:30 am

    In the spring of 1972, Becker gave a six part video lecture with Fulton Fisher at the CBC studios in Vancouver, British Columbia. It was called, “Dialogue on Man,” and it put the two protagonists on a studio floor, with Fisher arguing for the scientific bent to our destiny, Becker the cultural anthropology of our destiny. Or something like that! I was in the audience and if anyone would like the “tapes” out of the CBC archives, I will try and pass them on. So far CBC has not responded to my entreaties.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

More in Classics

Register or Login

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 15 other subscribers

Join us on Facebook



Follow us on Twitter

To Top
%d bloggers like this: