<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Churchill by Paul Johnson</title> <atom:link href="http://calitreview.com/5636/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://calitreview.com/5636</link> <description>An arts and culture magazine.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:21:58 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Julia Braun Kessler</title><link>http://calitreview.com/5636/comment-page-1#comment-81165</link> <dc:creator>Julia Braun Kessler</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 00:30:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com/?p=5636#comment-81165</guid> <description>Dear David Grandy,
I reviewed the text of  Johnson&#039;s Churchill  to see if the source of this particular mess was the father, and not the grandfather, and must say am still a bit confused by his account.   I would love to hear further from you if you know more of the circumstance of the matter mentioned.   Meanwhile, here&#039;s the text I drew my conclusion from:
&quot;In the mid-1870s the Churchills went into exile in Dublin after Lord Randolph, characteristically, took violent sides with his elder brother over a woman and antagonized the Prince of Wales.  The Duke of Marlborough had to be appointed viceroy of Ireland, and thither the Churchills went, to electrify Dublin Castle, until the storm blew over.  Winston&#039;s earliest memory was of his grandfather, then viceroy, haranguing the elite in the courtyard of their castle.  The subject: war....&quot;    This is immediately followed by another tack entirely, &quot;Winston saw little of his parents, then and later....&quot; and it goes on with talk of his nanny.
In other words, the grandfather was involved with the scandal, whether responsible for it or not,  from re-reading this text, though I would be inclined to say that you are right  and that it was the father, after all, who was the cause of the scandal .   Certainly, Winston&#039;s father&#039;s life had been filled with such troublesome outbursts. t Johnson observes of Lord Randolph at one point,  &quot;His political life was meteoric, turbulent and punctuated with spectacular rows&quot;  (and follows that with some specific incidents)  so it may have been the case here as well.    Still, at this distance, it is hard to understand the politics of how that one really went.  By all means fill me in if you have particulars.
Thank you.
Julia Braun Kessler
 </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear David Grandy,<br
/> I reviewed the text of  Johnson&#8217;s Churchill  to see if the source of this particular mess was the father, and not the grandfather, and must say am still a bit confused by his account.   I would love to hear further from you if you know more of the circumstance of the matter mentioned.   Meanwhile, here&#8217;s the text I drew my conclusion from:</p><p>&#8220;In the mid-1870s the Churchills went into exile in Dublin after Lord Randolph, characteristically, took violent sides with his elder brother over a woman and antagonized the Prince of Wales.  The Duke of Marlborough had to be appointed viceroy of Ireland, and thither the Churchills went, to electrify Dublin Castle, until the storm blew over.  Winston&#8217;s earliest memory was of his grandfather, then viceroy, haranguing the elite in the courtyard of their castle.  The subject: war&#8230;.&#8221;    This is immediately followed by another tack entirely, &#8220;Winston saw little of his parents, then and later&#8230;.&#8221; and it goes on with talk of his nanny.</p><p>In other words, the grandfather was involved with the scandal, whether responsible for it or not,  from re-reading this text, though I would be inclined to say that you are right  and that it was the father, after all, who was the cause of the scandal .   Certainly, Winston&#8217;s father&#8217;s life had been filled with such troublesome outbursts. t Johnson observes of Lord Randolph at one point,  &#8221;His political life was meteoric, turbulent and punctuated with spectacular rows&#8221;  (and follows that with some specific incidents)  so it may have been the case here as well.    Still, at this distance, it is hard to understand the politics of how that one really went.  By all means fill me in if you have particulars.<br
/> Thank you.<br
/> Julia Braun Kessler<br
/>  </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Grandy</title><link>http://calitreview.com/5636/comment-page-1#comment-80930</link> <dc:creator>David Grandy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 07:11:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com/?p=5636#comment-80930</guid> <description>&quot;Meanwhile, the family itself was disgraced when his grandfather antagonized the Prince of Wales and they were quickly dispatched into exile in Dublin.&quot;
I&#039;m pretty sure that it was Churchill&#039;s FATHER not grandfather who caused this problem.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Meanwhile, the family itself was disgraced when his grandfather antagonized the Prince of Wales and they were quickly dispatched into exile in Dublin.&#8221;</p><p>I&#8217;m pretty sure that it was Churchill&#8217;s FATHER not grandfather who caused this problem.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
