<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Under the Dome by Stephen King</title> <atom:link href="http://calitreview.com/5394/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://calitreview.com/5394</link> <description>An arts and culture magazine.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:21:58 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Bob TyranT</title><link>http://calitreview.com/5394/comment-page-1#comment-132080</link> <dc:creator>Bob TyranT</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 05:31:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com/?p=5394#comment-132080</guid> <description>I actually liked Lisey&#039;s Story more thab Duma Key lol I agree that Under The Doom is indeed mighty fine! HIS BEST IN YEARS PERIOD!!  P.S. Pennywise in cahoots with The Dome?? Amazing lol</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually liked Lisey&#8217;s Story more thab Duma Key lol I agree that Under The Doom is indeed mighty fine! HIS BEST IN YEARS PERIOD!!  P.S. Pennywise in cahoots with The Dome?? Amazing lol</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Eric</title><link>http://calitreview.com/5394/comment-page-1#comment-125165</link> <dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:54:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com/?p=5394#comment-125165</guid> <description>I liked this book a lot, but I take issue with this being his best in years. I think Duma Key and Lisey&#039;s Story were both quite better.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked this book a lot, but I take issue with this being his best in years. I think Duma Key and Lisey&#8217;s Story were both quite better.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: thinkgreen</title><link>http://calitreview.com/5394/comment-page-1#comment-121129</link> <dc:creator>thinkgreen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 20:56:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com/?p=5394#comment-121129</guid> <description>*generating...:P</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*generating&#8230;:P</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: thinkgreen</title><link>http://calitreview.com/5394/comment-page-1#comment-121128</link> <dc:creator>thinkgreen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 20:55:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com/?p=5394#comment-121128</guid> <description>greatest book ever. anybody notice that the symbol on the box generatint the dome is the same symbol that was on the door to the It&#039;s lair?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>greatest book ever. anybody notice that the symbol on the box generatint the dome is the same symbol that was on the door to the It&#8217;s lair?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris</title><link>http://calitreview.com/5394/comment-page-1#comment-106262</link> <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:11:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com/?p=5394#comment-106262</guid> <description>Overly long, bloated, a weak story. This is one of King&#039;s worst books in years. Cardboard characters with a story stolen from &quot;The Simpsons&quot; movie. Stay away from this tripe and read Duma Key instead.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overly long, bloated, a weak story. This is one of King&#8217;s worst books in years. Cardboard characters with a story stolen from &#8220;The Simpsons&#8221; movie. Stay away from this tripe and read Duma Key instead.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alexandr Vergelis</title><link>http://calitreview.com/5394/comment-page-1#comment-97756</link> <dc:creator>Alexandr Vergelis</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 11:45:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com/?p=5394#comment-97756</guid> <description>For me, as a poet, it was very interesting!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me, as a poet, it was very interesting!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: docbill</title><link>http://calitreview.com/5394/comment-page-1#comment-93512</link> <dc:creator>docbill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:11:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com/?p=5394#comment-93512</guid> <description>I have never read a Stephen King book before, but I have seen many movies based off his books. As expected his books are not much different than the movies. Stephen King seems to have the curse of writing great beginnings and then not knowing how to end them. Besides the lame ending, one thing that really bother me about this book was the gross technical inaccuracy. Many people do things like confuse GSM with Wifi, so I can&#039;t hold that against him. I can also forgive him for not thinking about using induction to transmit power to the people in the dome, and to create breathable air at the end, since Stephen King is not a scientist. However, Stephen King seems to lack even a grade school understanding of combustion engines. All combustion engines require three things: fuel, spark, and air. How in the world people could be driving cars when there is not enough oxygen to breath, is beyond me. I could ignore this flaw, and simply pretend like all the vehicles are battery powered. However, the generators would have the same requirement. The story makes too big a deal out of the propane for me to suspend my disbelief, or do something like pretend the generators are backup batteries or such...
My recommendation is read the book until the climax, and then make-up your own ending.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never read a Stephen King book before, but I have seen many movies based off his books. As expected his books are not much different than the movies. Stephen King seems to have the curse of writing great beginnings and then not knowing how to end them. Besides the lame ending, one thing that really bother me about this book was the gross technical inaccuracy. Many people do things like confuse GSM with Wifi, so I can&#8217;t hold that against him. I can also forgive him for not thinking about using induction to transmit power to the people in the dome, and to create breathable air at the end, since Stephen King is not a scientist. However, Stephen King seems to lack even a grade school understanding of combustion engines. All combustion engines require three things: fuel, spark, and air. How in the world people could be driving cars when there is not enough oxygen to breath, is beyond me. I could ignore this flaw, and simply pretend like all the vehicles are battery powered. However, the generators would have the same requirement. The story makes too big a deal out of the propane for me to suspend my disbelief, or do something like pretend the generators are backup batteries or such&#8230;</p><p>My recommendation is read the book until the climax, and then make-up your own ending.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: chalenavigil</title><link>http://calitreview.com/5394/comment-page-1#comment-85867</link> <dc:creator>chalenavigil</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:30:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com/?p=5394#comment-85867</guid> <description>THIS BOOK IS BEST ONE YET!!!!! I LOVE STEPHEN kING AND HIS WAY OF THINKING</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THIS BOOK IS BEST ONE YET!!!!! I LOVE STEPHEN kING AND HIS WAY OF THINKING</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kyla</title><link>http://calitreview.com/5394/comment-page-1#comment-83228</link> <dc:creator>Kyla</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 20:51:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com/?p=5394#comment-83228</guid> <description>I LOVED this book.  I read it in less than a week, I couldnt put it down.
Was totally disappointed with the ending. :(.  I guess I didn&#039;t understand why the Dome was there in the first place. If anyone is willing to explain, it&#039;d be greatly appreciated!!!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LOVED this book.  I read it in less than a week, I couldnt put it down.<br
/> Was totally disappointed with the ending. :(.  I guess I didn&#8217;t understand why the Dome was there in the first place. If anyone is willing to explain, it&#8217;d be greatly appreciated!!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Marilyn K. Cochran</title><link>http://calitreview.com/5394/comment-page-1#comment-76546</link> <dc:creator>Marilyn K. Cochran</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:42:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com/?p=5394#comment-76546</guid> <description>I received this book in the mail from the Stephen King book club on a Wednesday the week before Thanksgiving. It is 1100 and some pages. I finished it Thanksgiving morning!!! I literally could not put it down. I have many books and a huge pile of library books but once I got into this it was great - Classic King if you ask me and I&#039;ve read them all. So enjoy!!!! Loved the &quot;In-A-Gadda-Da- Vida&quot; reference!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I received this book in the mail from the Stephen King book club on a Wednesday the week before Thanksgiving. It is 1100 and some pages. I finished it Thanksgiving morning!!! I literally could not put it down. I have many books and a huge pile of library books but once I got into this it was great &#8211; Classic King if you ask me and I&#8217;ve read them all. So enjoy!!!! Loved the &#8220;In-A-Gadda-Da- Vida&#8221; reference!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cenk Armagan</title><link>http://calitreview.com/5394/comment-page-1#comment-76441</link> <dc:creator>Cenk Armagan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 09:57:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com/?p=5394#comment-76441</guid> <description>I have not read anything as fast as Under the Dome in the last 15 years and this includes Stephen King books. It is surprising that the book takes place within a week. Is there any writer out there who can orchestrate such large cast of characters, subplots and feelings within such small scale of time and location? I don&#039;t think but if there is I will be happy to read and salute him.
By the way, I disagree with those who think Duma Key was not good. On the contrary, it was a helluva riding, a hallucinatory read. It was SK&#039;s best thing in the last 15 years before Under the Dome was released. Here is a happy fan to see that his favorite writer is on the full rise again after too many run of the mill offerings.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not read anything as fast as Under the Dome in the last 15 years and this includes Stephen King books. It is surprising that the book takes place within a week. Is there any writer out there who can orchestrate such large cast of characters, subplots and feelings within such small scale of time and location? I don&#8217;t think but if there is I will be happy to read and salute him.</p><p>By the way, I disagree with those who think Duma Key was not good. On the contrary, it was a helluva riding, a hallucinatory read. It was SK&#8217;s best thing in the last 15 years before Under the Dome was released. Here is a happy fan to see that his favorite writer is on the full rise again after too many run of the mill offerings.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lorraine Peddle</title><link>http://calitreview.com/5394/comment-page-1#comment-75015</link> <dc:creator>Lorraine Peddle</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:44:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com/?p=5394#comment-75015</guid> <description>The KING is back.  Love &quot;Under the Dome&quot;.  He is great.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The KING is back.  Love &#8220;Under the Dome&#8221;.  He is great.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jacob Waalk</title><link>http://calitreview.com/5394/comment-page-1#comment-73993</link> <dc:creator>Jacob Waalk</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:24:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com/?p=5394#comment-73993</guid> <description>Duma Key was really good, the first two thirds made my favorite bit of writing by King, a collection of his most realistic and sympathetic characters as well as a genuinely mysterious and scary supernatural element. But then he did what he tends to always do and mire it in unoriginality and drollness when he attempts to over explain everything at the end, and so it becomes pirates of the Caribbean and highly dissatisfying. If he learned that a real unexplained mystery is always scarier than his overly defined clear cut stories which end with a specific way to defeat the evil, his work would be infinitely better. As it is the first two thirds of Duma Key work quite nicely.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duma Key was really good, the first two thirds made my favorite bit of writing by King, a collection of his most realistic and sympathetic characters as well as a genuinely mysterious and scary supernatural element. But then he did what he tends to always do and mire it in unoriginality and drollness when he attempts to over explain everything at the end, and so it becomes pirates of the Caribbean and highly dissatisfying. If he learned that a real unexplained mystery is always scarier than his overly defined clear cut stories which end with a specific way to defeat the evil, his work would be infinitely better. As it is the first two thirds of Duma Key work quite nicely.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Collin Zaar</title><link>http://calitreview.com/5394/comment-page-1#comment-73723</link> <dc:creator>Collin Zaar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:38:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com/?p=5394#comment-73723</guid> <description>What&#039;s wrong with DUMA?  Duma was fantastic.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s wrong with DUMA?  Duma was fantastic.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: under the dome</title><link>http://calitreview.com/5394/comment-page-1#comment-73644</link> <dc:creator>under the dome</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:26:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com/?p=5394#comment-73644</guid> <description>nice review..
I have to learn from you</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice review..<br
/> I have to learn from you</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Paul Comstock</title><link>http://calitreview.com/5394/comment-page-1#comment-73607</link> <dc:creator>Paul Comstock</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:53:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com/?p=5394#comment-73607</guid> <description>@Andy - We&#039;ve corrected it. Thanks for the heads-up.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Andy &#8211; We&#8217;ve corrected it. Thanks for the heads-up.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andy Williamson</title><link>http://calitreview.com/5394/comment-page-1#comment-73572</link> <dc:creator>Andy Williamson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:30:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com/?p=5394#comment-73572</guid> <description>Nice review ... but I think when referring to &quot;the Raggedy Man&quot; in The Stand, you actually mean &quot;the Trashcan Man.&quot;  Just sayin&#039; ...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice review &#8230; but I think when referring to &#8220;the Raggedy Man&#8221; in The Stand, you actually mean &#8220;the Trashcan Man.&#8221;  Just sayin&#8217; &#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
