<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The Strange World of Quantum Entanglement</title> <atom:link href="http://calitreview.com/51/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://calitreview.com/51</link> <description>An arts and culture magazine.</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 14:35:02 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Ryan Fleming</title><link>http://calitreview.com/51/comment-page-2#comment-264008</link> <dc:creator>Ryan Fleming</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 03:20:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//interviews/the-strange-world-of-quantum-entanglement/#comment-264008</guid> <description>In the part talking about how a person could communicate across great distances the author says that the message would be &quot;traveling back in time&quot;. But wouldn&#039;t this only be true in technicality? Because, yes it is traveling back in time, but only because it is instantaneous. I believe that perhaps it stops time, for itself, then it has an infinite amount of &quot;Time&quot; (for lack of a better word) to travel X distance. I don&#039;t believe that the receiver would actual get the message before the information was sent therefore not messing up the space time continuum.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the part talking about how a person could communicate across great distances the author says that the message would be &#8220;traveling back in time&#8221;. But wouldn&#8217;t this only be true in technicality? Because, yes it is traveling back in time, but only because it is instantaneous. I believe that perhaps it stops time, for itself, then it has an infinite amount of &#8220;Time&#8221; (for lack of a better word) to travel X distance. I don&#8217;t believe that the receiver would actual get the message before the information was sent therefore not messing up the space time continuum.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Javier</title><link>http://calitreview.com/51/comment-page-2#comment-244723</link> <dc:creator>Javier</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 22:36:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//interviews/the-strange-world-of-quantum-entanglement/#comment-244723</guid> <description>Here entanglement without math but telling the truth.
In spanish
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hs1zv84fA3U</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here entanglement without math but telling the truth.<br
/> In spanish</p><p><span
style="text-align:center; display: block;"><a
href="http://calitreview.com/51"><img
src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/hs1zv84fA3U/2.jpg" alt="" /></a></span></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Russ Otter</title><link>http://calitreview.com/51/comment-page-2#comment-200228</link> <dc:creator>Russ Otter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 23:58:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//interviews/the-strange-world-of-quantum-entanglement/#comment-200228</guid> <description>PS... My website is http://otterthink.blogspot.com
Russ Otter</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS&#8230; My website is <a
href="http://otterthink.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://otterthink.blogspot.com</a></p><p>Russ Otter</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Russ Otter</title><link>http://calitreview.com/51/comment-page-2#comment-200227</link> <dc:creator>Russ Otter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 23:54:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//interviews/the-strange-world-of-quantum-entanglement/#comment-200227</guid> <description>Science is the journey of truth, of knowledge, versus the faithful and wishfully defined hopes of the great questions of existence.  Science trumps, mythology, ritual and superstition, but Science (Physics) will never complete its journey to know all.  That would be an infinite disposition, which is not definable, forever and a day.  I enjoy this subject matter of Time and Space which are Infinite, in other words, actually timeless and spaceless.  However from a finite realm they are real and practical, save some quantum bridges to the infinite perhaps?  I hope you view my website as I discuss these issues of &quot;Superposition&#039;s&quot;, &quot;Entanglement&quot;, and Infinity in terms, that are factual mathematical truths.  As mathematics proves that it breaks down in any attempt to understand infinity.  Hence intuition, is injected time and time again, trying link the finite with the infinite. But it will never happen.  Still they are networked together, as one does not exist without the other.  Please review my website for some essays on this subject matter.
Cheers, Russ and Thanks for this website...!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Science is the journey of truth, of knowledge, versus the faithful and wishfully defined hopes of the great questions of existence.  Science trumps, mythology, ritual and superstition, but Science (Physics) will never complete its journey to know all.  That would be an infinite disposition, which is not definable, forever and a day.  I enjoy this subject matter of Time and Space which are Infinite, in other words, actually timeless and spaceless.  However from a finite realm they are real and practical, save some quantum bridges to the infinite perhaps?  I hope you view my website as I discuss these issues of &#8220;Superposition&#8217;s&#8221;, &#8220;Entanglement&#8221;, and Infinity in terms, that are factual mathematical truths.  As mathematics proves that it breaks down in any attempt to understand infinity.  Hence intuition, is injected time and time again, trying link the finite with the infinite. But it will never happen.  Still they are networked together, as one does not exist without the other.  Please review my website for some essays on this subject matter.</p><p>Cheers, Russ and Thanks for this website&#8230;!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Listen.</title><link>http://calitreview.com/51/comment-page-2#comment-185994</link> <dc:creator>Listen.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 04:50:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//interviews/the-strange-world-of-quantum-entanglement/#comment-185994</guid> <description>Perhaps all entangled particles are joined together? Maybe we just can&#039;t see them like that...Like 2 cogs, move one and the other moves. They have no distance between them.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps all entangled particles are joined together? Maybe we just can&#8217;t see them like that&#8230;Like 2 cogs, move one and the other moves. They have no distance between them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: James Dunn</title><link>http://calitreview.com/51/comment-page-2#comment-168909</link> <dc:creator>James Dunn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 22:26:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//interviews/the-strange-world-of-quantum-entanglement/#comment-168909</guid> <description>Assuming the Big Bang to be plausible.  Would not entangled particles already exist connecting basically all matter everywhere?
A particle would not need to be &quot;sent&quot; to the furthest reaches of the universe, there plausibly already exists entangled particles within the Earth somewhere that has an entangled connection with the furthest reaches of the Universe.
Regarding &quot;Vikrant&quot;&#039;s assertion</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Assuming the Big Bang to be plausible.  Would not entangled particles already exist connecting basically all matter everywhere?</p><p>A particle would not need to be &#8220;sent&#8221; to the furthest reaches of the universe, there plausibly already exists entangled particles within the Earth somewhere that has an entangled connection with the furthest reaches of the Universe.</p><p>Regarding &#8220;Vikrant&#8221;&#8216;s assertion</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: James Dunn</title><link>http://calitreview.com/51/comment-page-2#comment-168906</link> <dc:creator>James Dunn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 22:16:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//interviews/the-strange-world-of-quantum-entanglement/#comment-168906</guid> <description>At some point, all the Earth and ourselves were part of the Sun.  Electrons in a frenzy coming in contact with one another.  The Big Bang being potentially even a more basic alignment of entanglement.
So our brains are composed of similar compositions and arranged in similar composites of molecules, and neurons firing without hardly a random component.
If one or more people&#039;s brains have entangled particles throughout the subconcious; could entanglement provide for a mechanism of subtley influencing the timing of neuron pulses?  A global consciousness and a subconscious connection.
Princeton University has been researching the observable influence of global consciousness for many years.  Might quantum entanglement be the basis of a shared conciousness?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At some point, all the Earth and ourselves were part of the Sun.  Electrons in a frenzy coming in contact with one another.  The Big Bang being potentially even a more basic alignment of entanglement.</p><p>So our brains are composed of similar compositions and arranged in similar composites of molecules, and neurons firing without hardly a random component.</p><p>If one or more people&#8217;s brains have entangled particles throughout the subconcious; could entanglement provide for a mechanism of subtley influencing the timing of neuron pulses?  A global consciousness and a subconscious connection.</p><p>Princeton University has been researching the observable influence of global consciousness for many years.  Might quantum entanglement be the basis of a shared conciousness?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rick</title><link>http://calitreview.com/51/comment-page-2#comment-148271</link> <dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 05:20:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//interviews/the-strange-world-of-quantum-entanglement/#comment-148271</guid> <description>The way I see it is that all you need is to measure two types of information being transferred. If this can be done then all the sender and receiver need to do is assign a 0 or a 1 to the information....simple binary code. As for the problem of reading the information couldn&#039;t an indirect method of reading the particle&#039;s information be used....sort of like looking at it&#039;s shadow verses looking at it directly? Am I even Making sense?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way I see it is that all you need is to measure two types of information being transferred. If this can be done then all the sender and receiver need to do is assign a 0 or a 1 to the information&#8230;.simple binary code. As for the problem of reading the information couldn&#8217;t an indirect method of reading the particle&#8217;s information be used&#8230;.sort of like looking at it&#8217;s shadow verses looking at it directly? Am I even Making sense?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Steven Cinquegrana</title><link>http://calitreview.com/51/comment-page-2#comment-133175</link> <dc:creator>Steven Cinquegrana</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 15:00:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//interviews/the-strange-world-of-quantum-entanglement/#comment-133175</guid> <description>If I riddled you this, what would you say? &quot;Given that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light and that two objects appear to exchange information instantaneously, what is the distance between them?&quot;
When you put it like this, the only logical answer is &quot;There is ZERO distance between them.&quot;
This &quot;Occam&#039;s Razor&quot; approach implies that there is possibly some lower dimension - I would call it the &#039;Zeroth Dimension&#039; - where time exists without any spatial dimensions and wherein all matter occupies a single spatial point. This Zeroth Dimension would encapsulate the entire universe as we define it but would normally be undetectable to us apart from incongruences such as quantum entanglement&#039;s &#039;spooky action at a distance&#039;.
So many physicists seem obsessed with higher dimensions (eg String Theory). Why not look lower?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I riddled you this, what would you say? &#8220;Given that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light and that two objects appear to exchange information instantaneously, what is the distance between them?&#8221;</p><p>When you put it like this, the only logical answer is &#8220;There is ZERO distance between them.&#8221;</p><p>This &#8220;Occam&#8217;s Razor&#8221; approach implies that there is possibly some lower dimension &#8211; I would call it the &#8216;Zeroth Dimension&#8217; &#8211; where time exists without any spatial dimensions and wherein all matter occupies a single spatial point. This Zeroth Dimension would encapsulate the entire universe as we define it but would normally be undetectable to us apart from incongruences such as quantum entanglement&#8217;s &#8216;spooky action at a distance&#8217;.</p><p>So many physicists seem obsessed with higher dimensions (eg String Theory). Why not look lower?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Vikrant singh Chauhan</title><link>http://calitreview.com/51/comment-page-2#comment-119976</link> <dc:creator>Vikrant singh Chauhan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 07:28:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//interviews/the-strange-world-of-quantum-entanglement/#comment-119976</guid> <description>This is really something amzing.....if it really worked (which is not possible as we can&#039;t intecept in the connection b/w entangled particles) then we can probably search for the limit of the universe,i.e how exactly is it big? by just sending half of the entangled system to a sufficient possible distance and then decoding the information it has at that point.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really something amzing&#8230;..if it really worked (which is not possible as we can&#8217;t intecept in the connection b/w entangled particles) then we can probably search for the limit of the universe,i.e how exactly is it big? by just sending half of the entangled system to a sufficient possible distance and then decoding the information it has at that point.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: paolo manzelli</title><link>http://calitreview.com/51/comment-page-2#comment-118115</link> <dc:creator>paolo manzelli</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:30:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//interviews/the-strange-world-of-quantum-entanglement/#comment-118115</guid> <description>Entanglement Age
Contemporarily emerging culture from Quantum Entanglement.
View on facebook groups : Entanglement. http://it-it.facebook.com/home.php?sk=group_124412900950948
Paolo Manzelli ; LRE@UNIFI.IT : www.edscuola.it/lre.html ; www.wbabin.net
Yin-Yang entangled colours overposition
When two quantum systems (electrons, photons of light , phonons of the sound, etc ...) interpenetrate each other (Entangled Systems) is determined a new state that presents new synergies changing the quality of the physical systems involved. “Entangled Systems” in fact do not behave as isolated systems, but as complex sets showing simultaneity of information .
Therefore, in the presence of entanglement, a change made on one part of a coupled systemm instantly determines a change in the state of the other side of the other system. This simultaneity of information appears inconsistent with the conceptions of &quot;mechanics&quot; of physics, all based on localized single systems and also appears to undermine the principle of the constancy of the speed of light that does not allow  the simultaneity of events, except as the case of a random situation.
Therefore,  to undestand &quot;Entangled Systems&quot;, starting from that show the experiment of Alain Aspect (1982) , become a need to accept the evidence of an at distance &quot;synchronized behavior&quot; , that have been excluded for more than a century from the traditional science only for academic interest, because such synchronism gave rise to an embarrassing paradoxical situation that led scientific accademy to not being able to avoid the obvious conclusion that &quot;quantum mechanics&quot; was an incomplete theory of particle physics. (1)
Syncronicity  between up/down entangled hand&#039;s motion
In fact, under the usual setting of Quantum Mechanics&#039;s the admissione of the simultaneous correlation of information, would correspond to exceed the Heisenberg Uncertainty postulate for all cases that can be obtained “Entangled Systems”.
Entanglement is a the word used for the first time by Erwin Schroedinger (1926), and it is synonymous with the words  &quot;plot, intrigue, penetration, sharing, coupling&quot;, and it brings with a key to understanding the science,  to forecast a more complete  development of contemporary scientific and technological knowledge, in order to create a different perspective of major theoretical and applicative investigations on nano-technologies, but also the “quantum entanglement” allow the opening of new solutions in the elaboration of quantum information and in many other innovative aspects of contemporarily science.
Unfortunately, the academic science, as we recognize the history of ideas, often it is unable to overcome their conceptual limits. See e.g. a dialog on &quot;What happens between darkness and light&quot;  (2)
From the above dialog follows that the visible light emitted as photons from the sun, reaching its maximum speed when photons travelling in the space enrich a low density of interactions. In this condition photons  become  very close to the speed of light and  they lose their &quot;kinetic mass&quot; (m = E/c2), therefore photons can be &quot;entangled&quot; forming a simultaneous field of information energy ( “photonic field” ) that behaves like a pure stationary waves   oscillating in a large extension of the space.
When such a “photonic field” interacts with the Earth&#039;s atmosphere,  stationary extended waves of simultaneously information,  chrash , and the photonic field is decoded back into single photons travelling in the form of small particles.
This dynamic of trasformation between single photons and the photonic field  provides a plausible explanation as to why we effectively see almost at the same time the rising and setting sun on the horizon.
Such an short interpretation involves a more complex  theory on the space/time quantization based on four-vector transformation, tis theory that makes a plausible evolution of quantum relativity , which will give impetus to a new paradigm of science for the development of future society of shared knowledge.
Picasso
ENTANGLEMENT AND PHOTONIC&#039;S WAVE FIELD
The formation of a group discussion on the Entanglement on Facebook and its prospects for change by maans a systems of Entangled Minds now is open to all who wish to deepen the development of new ideas in science and art to reinvent the paradigm of contemporarily knowledge  society.
BIBLIO ON LINE
(1)- - Science of Quality: http://www.edscuola.it/archivio/lre/science_of_quality_1.htm
(2)-: Sun light : http://www.edscuola.it/archivio/lre/sole.pdf</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Entanglement Age<br
/> Contemporarily emerging culture from Quantum Entanglement.<br
/> View on facebook groups : Entanglement. <a
href="http://it-it.facebook.com/home.php?sk=group_124412900950948" rel="nofollow">http://it-it.facebook.com/home.php?sk=group_124412900950948</a><br
/> Paolo Manzelli ; <a
href="mailto:LRE@UNIFI.IT">LRE@UNIFI.IT</a> : <a
href="http://www.edscuola.it/lre.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.edscuola.it/lre.html</a> ; <a
href="http://www.wbabin.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.wbabin.net</a></p><p> Yin-Yang entangled colours overposition</p><p>When two quantum systems (electrons, photons of light , phonons of the sound, etc &#8230;) interpenetrate each other (Entangled Systems) is determined a new state that presents new synergies changing the quality of the physical systems involved. “Entangled Systems” in fact do not behave as isolated systems, but as complex sets showing simultaneity of information .</p><p>Therefore, in the presence of entanglement, a change made on one part of a coupled systemm instantly determines a change in the state of the other side of the other system. This simultaneity of information appears inconsistent with the conceptions of &#8220;mechanics&#8221; of physics, all based on localized single systems and also appears to undermine the principle of the constancy of the speed of light that does not allow  the simultaneity of events, except as the case of a random situation.</p><p>Therefore,  to undestand &#8220;Entangled Systems&#8221;, starting from that show the experiment of Alain Aspect (1982) , become a need to accept the evidence of an at distance &#8220;synchronized behavior&#8221; , that have been excluded for more than a century from the traditional science only for academic interest, because such synchronism gave rise to an embarrassing paradoxical situation that led scientific accademy to not being able to avoid the obvious conclusion that &#8220;quantum mechanics&#8221; was an incomplete theory of particle physics. (1)</p><p> Syncronicity  between up/down entangled hand&#8217;s motion</p><p> In fact, under the usual setting of Quantum Mechanics&#8217;s the admissione of the simultaneous correlation of information, would correspond to exceed the Heisenberg Uncertainty postulate for all cases that can be obtained “Entangled Systems”.<br
/> Entanglement is a the word used for the first time by Erwin Schroedinger (1926), and it is synonymous with the words  &#8220;plot, intrigue, penetration, sharing, coupling&#8221;, and it brings with a key to understanding the science,  to forecast a more complete  development of contemporary scientific and technological knowledge, in order to create a different perspective of major theoretical and applicative investigations on nano-technologies, but also the “quantum entanglement” allow the opening of new solutions in the elaboration of quantum information and in many other innovative aspects of contemporarily science.<br
/> Unfortunately, the academic science, as we recognize the history of ideas, often it is unable to overcome their conceptual limits. See e.g. a dialog on &#8220;What happens between darkness and light&#8221;  (2)</p><p>From the above dialog follows that the visible light emitted as photons from the sun, reaching its maximum speed when photons travelling in the space enrich a low density of interactions. In this condition photons  become  very close to the speed of light and  they lose their &#8220;kinetic mass&#8221; (m = E/c2), therefore photons can be &#8220;entangled&#8221; forming a simultaneous field of information energy ( “photonic field” ) that behaves like a pure stationary waves   oscillating in a large extension of the space.<br
/> When such a “photonic field” interacts with the Earth&#8217;s atmosphere,  stationary extended waves of simultaneously information,  chrash , and the photonic field is decoded back into single photons travelling in the form of small particles.<br
/> This dynamic of trasformation between single photons and the photonic field  provides a plausible explanation as to why we effectively see almost at the same time the rising and setting sun on the horizon.</p><p>Such an short interpretation involves a more complex  theory on the space/time quantization based on four-vector transformation, tis theory that makes a plausible evolution of quantum relativity , which will give impetus to a new paradigm of science for the development of future society of shared knowledge.</p><p>Picasso</p><p>ENTANGLEMENT AND PHOTONIC&#8217;S WAVE FIELD<br
/> The formation of a group discussion on the Entanglement on Facebook and its prospects for change by maans a systems of Entangled Minds now is open to all who wish to deepen the development of new ideas in science and art to reinvent the paradigm of contemporarily knowledge  society.</p><p>BIBLIO ON LINE<br
/> (1)- &#8211; Science of Quality: <a
href="http://www.edscuola.it/archivio/lre/science_of_quality_1.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.edscuola.it/archivio/lre/science_of_quality_1.htm</a><br
/> (2)-: Sun light : <a
href="http://www.edscuola.it/archivio/lre/sole.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.edscuola.it/archivio/lre/sole.pdf</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jobless</title><link>http://calitreview.com/51/comment-page-2#comment-113954</link> <dc:creator>jobless</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 19:57:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//interviews/the-strange-world-of-quantum-entanglement/#comment-113954</guid> <description>Ahh, but yes instant communication is possible using certain variables. With the right signature and the process of decay being a constant one could rig two devices which could communicate actual data faster than light. Distance would not be a factor. But no, that would only prove Einstein wrong when he said nothing could go faster than light so we can&#039;t do it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh, but yes instant communication is possible using certain variables. With the right signature and the process of decay being a constant one could rig two devices which could communicate actual data faster than light. Distance would not be a factor. But no, that would only prove Einstein wrong when he said nothing could go faster than light so we can&#8217;t do it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Currie</title><link>http://calitreview.com/51/comment-page-2#comment-111949</link> <dc:creator>David Currie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 01:53:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//interviews/the-strange-world-of-quantum-entanglement/#comment-111949</guid> <description>Aren&#039;t we up to about 11 dimensions now; Time, traditional 3D space, and 7 so called &#039;rolled up&#039; dimensions.  In the rolled up dimensions ALL particles would be contiguous and therefore capable of virtually instantaneous communication with one another.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t we up to about 11 dimensions now; Time, traditional 3D space, and 7 so called &#8216;rolled up&#8217; dimensions.  In the rolled up dimensions ALL particles would be contiguous and therefore capable of virtually instantaneous communication with one another.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jeremy</title><link>http://calitreview.com/51/comment-page-2#comment-103767</link> <dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:33:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//interviews/the-strange-world-of-quantum-entanglement/#comment-103767</guid> <description>rol, this forced entanglement requires energy I&#039;m sure..how much I don&#039;t know but if it takes a 15 kilojoules to send 1 kilojoules that&#039;s not very energy efficient. This is just a perspective not a personal attack.
cheers!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rol, this forced entanglement requires energy I&#8217;m sure..how much I don&#8217;t know but if it takes a 15 kilojoules to send 1 kilojoules that&#8217;s not very energy efficient. This is just a perspective not a personal attack.<br
/> cheers!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rol</title><link>http://calitreview.com/51/comment-page-2#comment-103758</link> <dc:creator>rol</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:16:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//interviews/the-strange-world-of-quantum-entanglement/#comment-103758</guid> <description>If a small particle can be teleported, then it surely wouldn&#039;t be a great feat to do the same with an electron.
...and if one electron, then why not the output of 100 square miles of solar panels orbiting the sun?
Limitless energy, delivered globally, at a cost so cheap it would be uneconomical to meter.
...or has this already been copyrighted and shelved in the cabinet &quot;Do not open until all the money has been made out of oil&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a small particle can be teleported, then it surely wouldn&#8217;t be a great feat to do the same with an electron.</p><p>&#8230;and if one electron, then why not the output of 100 square miles of solar panels orbiting the sun?</p><p>Limitless energy, delivered globally, at a cost so cheap it would be uneconomical to meter.</p><p>&#8230;or has this already been copyrighted and shelved in the cabinet &#8220;Do not open until all the money has been made out of oil&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris wilson</title><link>http://calitreview.com/51/comment-page-2#comment-103109</link> <dc:creator>Chris wilson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 01:26:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//interviews/the-strange-world-of-quantum-entanglement/#comment-103109</guid> <description>Could it be that entanglement is based on observation?
Is it not a wave( A particle) and all possibilities can be realized
until measured. So if a particle here(on earth) is a negative charge,
then the other part of that particle, let&#039;s say it is at the other end
of the universe, is automatically positive. If you change the negative charge to a positive charge, then at the other end of the universe the particle is now negative charged. Could be that our observation of the particle here on earth,
would effect our observation of the particle/wave at the end of the universe.
So could it be that it is the observation that determines what is going in entanglement, not a breaking of the light speed limit?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could it be that entanglement is based on observation?<br
/> Is it not a wave( A particle) and all possibilities can be realized<br
/> until measured. So if a particle here(on earth) is a negative charge,<br
/> then the other part of that particle, let&#8217;s say it is at the other end<br
/> of the universe, is automatically positive. If you change the negative charge to a positive charge, then at the other end of the universe the particle is now negative charged. Could be that our observation of the particle here on earth,<br
/> would effect our observation of the particle/wave at the end of the universe.<br
/> So could it be that it is the observation that determines what is going in entanglement, not a breaking of the light speed limit?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Harley Borgais</title><link>http://calitreview.com/51/comment-page-2#comment-98236</link> <dc:creator>Harley Borgais</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 09:37:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//interviews/the-strange-world-of-quantum-entanglement/#comment-98236</guid> <description>Wanna see an actual photo of atoms, the first one, taken by a Nemescope? http://www.freeornottobe.org/freeornottobe/Nemescope- 1st Photo of Atoms (smaller).jpg</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wanna see an actual photo of atoms, the first one, taken by a Nemescope? <a
href="http://www.freeornottobe.org/freeornottobe/Nemescope-" rel="nofollow">http://www.freeornottobe.org/freeornottobe/Nemescope-</a> 1st Photo of Atoms (smaller).jpg</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: James</title><link>http://calitreview.com/51/comment-page-2#comment-97840</link> <dc:creator>James</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 04:44:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//interviews/the-strange-world-of-quantum-entanglement/#comment-97840</guid> <description>Perhaps particles in my brain picked up the fact that you posted about no one reading the article for some time. One thing I have never been clear on is whether or not EVERY quantum particle has an entangled partner, somewhere in the Universe? My personal theory, based on nothing at all, is that yes, all particles have an entangled partner, perhaps several. Entanglement could really explain so many things. You mentioned telepathy but what everyday, strange occurrences? On at least 3 occasions in the last 6 months or so, I randomly thought of a person I have not thought of in a long time for no reason. Within hours, sometimes minutes, I ran into that person. Coincidence? The odds of three, different, events like this are pretty low! It has been shown that plants have some sort of &quot;sense&quot; as measured on polygraphs. They are known to even react to negative (I&#039;m gonna stomp that plant!) thoughts? How could this be? Once again, entanglement might explain it. I truly think it is the most exciting field of study in physics and predict that it will lead to some astonishing technology and fascinating science. I plan to buy your book soon!
James</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps particles in my brain picked up the fact that you posted about no one reading the article for some time. One thing I have never been clear on is whether or not EVERY quantum particle has an entangled partner, somewhere in the Universe? My personal theory, based on nothing at all, is that yes, all particles have an entangled partner, perhaps several. Entanglement could really explain so many things. You mentioned telepathy but what everyday, strange occurrences? On at least 3 occasions in the last 6 months or so, I randomly thought of a person I have not thought of in a long time for no reason. Within hours, sometimes minutes, I ran into that person. Coincidence? The odds of three, different, events like this are pretty low! It has been shown that plants have some sort of &#8220;sense&#8221; as measured on polygraphs. They are known to even react to negative (I&#8217;m gonna stomp that plant!) thoughts? How could this be? Once again, entanglement might explain it. I truly think it is the most exciting field of study in physics and predict that it will lead to some astonishing technology and fascinating science. I plan to buy your book soon!<br
/> James</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: arnbar</title><link>http://calitreview.com/51/comment-page-2#comment-95514</link> <dc:creator>arnbar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 11:46:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//interviews/the-strange-world-of-quantum-entanglement/#comment-95514</guid> <description>No one has commented now for approximately 10 weeks.  Someone may read this later this year.  My thoughts will rest in cyberspace until then, unobserved.  When these ideas are observed, will my spin be identical or switched?  Never mind.
If Einstein was entitled to his intuitions about a universe based on clear laws rather then probability, can I harbor the intuition (just that) I get when 1) I read the above article and comments and 2) I look out at the cosmos and consider the &quot;size&quot; and &quot;age&quot; of it?   It is the following:  it seems quite conceivable that long aeons &quot;ago&quot; life developed elsewhere, solved the issue at hand here, and devised a system of teleportation (physical? intellectual? &quot;spiritual?&quot;) across the cosmos, and that in fact, the cosmos &quot;communicates with itself&quot; in some sense.  If this could be, humans could be just entering, in the next few hundred years, say, the point of access to this &quot;community.&quot;  Just grist for a SF plot I guess, but the idea that we are alone and destined to be that way forever is my own intolerable intellectual bugaboo.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one has commented now for approximately 10 weeks.  Someone may read this later this year.  My thoughts will rest in cyberspace until then, unobserved.  When these ideas are observed, will my spin be identical or switched?  Never mind.</p><p>If Einstein was entitled to his intuitions about a universe based on clear laws rather then probability, can I harbor the intuition (just that) I get when 1) I read the above article and comments and 2) I look out at the cosmos and consider the &#8220;size&#8221; and &#8220;age&#8221; of it?   It is the following:  it seems quite conceivable that long aeons &#8220;ago&#8221; life developed elsewhere, solved the issue at hand here, and devised a system of teleportation (physical? intellectual? &#8220;spiritual?&#8221;) across the cosmos, and that in fact, the cosmos &#8220;communicates with itself&#8221; in some sense.  If this could be, humans could be just entering, in the next few hundred years, say, the point of access to this &#8220;community.&#8221;  Just grist for a SF plot I guess, but the idea that we are alone and destined to be that way forever is my own intolerable intellectual bugaboo.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rod Merritt</title><link>http://calitreview.com/51/comment-page-2#comment-87103</link> <dc:creator>Rod Merritt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:58:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//interviews/the-strange-world-of-quantum-entanglement/#comment-87103</guid> <description>I don&#039;t see the quantum entangelement effect as that spooky. If the photons are traveling at the speed of light, then for them, time has stopped. Looking at the world from the viewpoint of the photons, they are at once still touching and separated. They are out of time and therefore are everywhere along their path of existence at the same time, to them anyway.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see the quantum entangelement effect as that spooky. If the photons are traveling at the speed of light, then for them, time has stopped. Looking at the world from the viewpoint of the photons, they are at once still touching and separated. They are out of time and therefore are everywhere along their path of existence at the same time, to them anyway.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kennard Laviers</title><link>http://calitreview.com/51/comment-page-2#comment-83574</link> <dc:creator>Kennard Laviers</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:20:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//interviews/the-strange-world-of-quantum-entanglement/#comment-83574</guid> <description>&quot;As for the act of measuring the spin of electrons actually changing them, I think this is a bit misleading. What they mean is that these values are constantly changing and can not be predicted (yet). Whatever it was before you observed it is different than what it is after, so in a sense, the act of observing it caused the change.&quot;
To expand on this, to detect a Q particle you have to &quot;see&quot; it somehow. How do we observe it? By shooting it with something (photon or some other particle) and observing the effect or letting it hit another particle causing a change. The problem is there is no way to see it without changing or destroying it. For that reason, we can only guess at where Q particles are is by using some probabilistic function (maximum likelihood function I would guess.) So, in order to know the spin of a Q particle we have to kill it in the process.
An analogy, suppose we can only see things by throwing a baseball at them, but everything we throw the baseball at is the same size or smaller then the baseball and so we can hear the collisions but whatever we hit with the ball is either knocked away, or destroyed in the process.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As for the act of measuring the spin of electrons actually changing them, I think this is a bit misleading. What they mean is that these values are constantly changing and can not be predicted (yet). Whatever it was before you observed it is different than what it is after, so in a sense, the act of observing it caused the change.&#8221;</p><p>To expand on this, to detect a Q particle you have to &#8220;see&#8221; it somehow. How do we observe it? By shooting it with something (photon or some other particle) and observing the effect or letting it hit another particle causing a change. The problem is there is no way to see it without changing or destroying it. For that reason, we can only guess at where Q particles are is by using some probabilistic function (maximum likelihood function I would guess.) So, in order to know the spin of a Q particle we have to kill it in the process.<br
/> An analogy, suppose we can only see things by throwing a baseball at them, but everything we throw the baseball at is the same size or smaller then the baseball and so we can hear the collisions but whatever we hit with the ball is either knocked away, or destroyed in the process.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brad Arnold</title><link>http://calitreview.com/51/comment-page-2#comment-83439</link> <dc:creator>Brad Arnold</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:10:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//interviews/the-strange-world-of-quantum-entanglement/#comment-83439</guid> <description>Terrestrial evolution ought to be considered in terms of extra terrestrial evolution in light of quantum entanglement.  Frankly, the complexity we are seeing here on Earth can&#039;t be accounted for solely by Darwinian Theory (in my humble opinion).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terrestrial evolution ought to be considered in terms of extra terrestrial evolution in light of quantum entanglement.  Frankly, the complexity we are seeing here on Earth can&#8217;t be accounted for solely by Darwinian Theory (in my humble opinion).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: joe dart</title><link>http://calitreview.com/51/comment-page-2#comment-69935</link> <dc:creator>joe dart</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:48:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//interviews/the-strange-world-of-quantum-entanglement/#comment-69935</guid> <description>I read an article somewhere that described an entanglement experiment using polarized light. The entangled beam was polarised and split and when one of the beams&#039; plane of polarization was rotated, the other rotated too. If the article I read describes the experiment correctly, then this seems like enough to send messages by rotating the beam with some kind of zeeman effect magnets.
Has anyone here heard of this experiemntal result?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read an article somewhere that described an entanglement experiment using polarized light. The entangled beam was polarised and split and when one of the beams&#8217; plane of polarization was rotated, the other rotated too. If the article I read describes the experiment correctly, then this seems like enough to send messages by rotating the beam with some kind of zeeman effect magnets.</p><p>Has anyone here heard of this experiemntal result?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: SARATH KRISHNAN</title><link>http://calitreview.com/51/comment-page-2#comment-59555</link> <dc:creator>SARATH KRISHNAN</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:53:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//interviews/the-strange-world-of-quantum-entanglement/#comment-59555</guid> <description>This is a really exciting phenomenon.Through this we are crossing into the borders of reality.Still a lot to go.if we can travel faster than light, the heart of reality is not so far,i hope!
ny way thanx for the wonderful article</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a really exciting phenomenon.Through this we are crossing into the borders of reality.Still a lot to go.if we can travel faster than light, the heart of reality is not so far,i hope!</p><p> ny way thanx for the wonderful article</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Soul</title><link>http://calitreview.com/51/comment-page-2#comment-55770</link> <dc:creator>Soul</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:04:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//interviews/the-strange-world-of-quantum-entanglement/#comment-55770</guid> <description>E=mc^2 is a proven theory, the faster you go the more mass you gain and require ever more energy to go faster, hence it is impossible to go faster than light. In a physical world and by conventional means that is.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>E=mc^2 is a proven theory, the faster you go the more mass you gain and require ever more energy to go faster, hence it is impossible to go faster than light. In a physical world and by conventional means that is.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: malachikrunch</title><link>http://calitreview.com/51/comment-page-2#comment-55449</link> <dc:creator>malachikrunch</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:02:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//interviews/the-strange-world-of-quantum-entanglement/#comment-55449</guid> <description>When the interviewee says that anything traveling faster than light would be going back in time he is referencing Einsteins theory of relativity. Einstein said there is an inverse proportion between speed and light, and that if one were to reach the speed of light time would stop. Therefore if you exceed the speed of light you would be travelling back in time. Of course there is always the possibility (ever-growing in popularity) that Einstein was wrong about that. The lower speed limit for entanglement has been estimated at 10000 times the speed of light. I prefer to think that our ideas of the structure of space itself are wrong. After all, Einsteins theories are easily observed through simple experiments.
As for the act of measuring the spin of electrons actually changing them, I think this is a bit misleading. What they mean is that these values are constantly changing and can not be predicted (yet). Whatever it was before you observed it is different than what it is after, so in a sense, the act of observing it caused the change.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the interviewee says that anything traveling faster than light would be going back in time he is referencing Einsteins theory of relativity. Einstein said there is an inverse proportion between speed and light, and that if one were to reach the speed of light time would stop. Therefore if you exceed the speed of light you would be travelling back in time. Of course there is always the possibility (ever-growing in popularity) that Einstein was wrong about that. The lower speed limit for entanglement has been estimated at 10000 times the speed of light. I prefer to think that our ideas of the structure of space itself are wrong. After all, Einsteins theories are easily observed through simple experiments.</p><p>As for the act of measuring the spin of electrons actually changing them, I think this is a bit misleading. What they mean is that these values are constantly changing and can not be predicted (yet). Whatever it was before you observed it is different than what it is after, so in a sense, the act of observing it caused the change.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: anonymous</title><link>http://calitreview.com/51/comment-page-2#comment-55318</link> <dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:50:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//interviews/the-strange-world-of-quantum-entanglement/#comment-55318</guid> <description>Yes, you can teleport your letter deterministically and faithfully, if you can write your letter with a quantum pen.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you can teleport your letter deterministically and faithfully, if you can write your letter with a quantum pen.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dik Roytman</title><link>http://calitreview.com/51/comment-page-2#comment-54846</link> <dc:creator>Dik Roytman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:10:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//interviews/the-strange-world-of-quantum-entanglement/#comment-54846</guid> <description>Telepathies in the pure state do not exist, being a by-effect of system of stabilisation of a composition of restricted group of animals. At the moment of mors the participant of group sends a signal to all terms of group is enlarges an issue and cancels losses. The group closed by a feedback to become immortal. At HS the feedback is realised differently. The dying person sees favourite and close to it people (the virtual reality is faultless), all gain the information on mors and a command on organism restoration. Losses of the term of group it is cancelled by augmentation of life expectancy of addressees.
The program disposable - everyone, gone through clinical mors get constant access to this program. It is enough to recollect any person to cure it. Motions of arms are thus urged, but are not binding, however it generates set of simulators. They are studied by the same scientists. Effect - a zero.
Base effect - boundless exterior memory on gravitational waves.
By-effect of exterior memory - treatment is indifferent to distance.
Treatment by-effect - telepathy - information interchange out of distance.
Telepathy by-effect - clairvoyance - information interchange out of time.
In a basis - use of the modulated gravitational waves for storage and an information transfer. Gravitational waves - a variant electromagnetic, but rate of diffusion misses. Double-reduction modulation is not obvious and can be found out only casually. Once will carry also to you. Can be.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Telepathies in the pure state do not exist, being a by-effect of system of stabilisation of a composition of restricted group of animals. At the moment of mors the participant of group sends a signal to all terms of group is enlarges an issue and cancels losses. The group closed by a feedback to become immortal. At HS the feedback is realised differently. The dying person sees favourite and close to it people (the virtual reality is faultless), all gain the information on mors and a command on organism restoration. Losses of the term of group it is cancelled by augmentation of life expectancy of addressees.<br
/> The program disposable &#8211; everyone, gone through clinical mors get constant access to this program. It is enough to recollect any person to cure it. Motions of arms are thus urged, but are not binding, however it generates set of simulators. They are studied by the same scientists. Effect &#8211; a zero.<br
/> Base effect &#8211; boundless exterior memory on gravitational waves.<br
/> By-effect of exterior memory &#8211; treatment is indifferent to distance.<br
/> Treatment by-effect &#8211; telepathy &#8211; information interchange out of distance.<br
/> Telepathy by-effect &#8211; clairvoyance &#8211; information interchange out of time.<br
/> In a basis &#8211; use of the modulated gravitational waves for storage and an information transfer. Gravitational waves &#8211; a variant electromagnetic, but rate of diffusion misses. Double-reduction modulation is not obvious and can be found out only casually. Once will carry also to you. Can be.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bill</title><link>http://calitreview.com/51/comment-page-2#comment-53454</link> <dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:15:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//interviews/the-strange-world-of-quantum-entanglement/#comment-53454</guid> <description>To me it seems like quantum entanglement &quot;communication&quot; would be similar if there was a coin flipping machine that flipped a coin inside a box until a button was pressed at which time the state of heads or tails is captured, but not yet known by the observers, the coin is in a heads and tails state, wave function.  Then the machine splits the coin in two, so that heads is one side and tails is on the other, and one half is shipped across the universe.  When my buddy at the other end of the universe opens his box, lets say he sees a tails, then he proudly proclaims he has knowledge faster than light, instaneous, that I have heads. Big Whoop.  That is not communication.  Communication would be if I have an up spin particle, and the entangled is down on the other side of the universe, but I did not want up, so I changed the spin my local particle to down instead, and the particle at the other end of the universe flips up instaneously.  Now we could send info back and forth because the spins would flip opposite.  THAT would be spooky action at a distance.  Unfortunately, the entanglement is broken when I change the spin locally of my particle.  The direction of spin is determined at the creation of the entangled pair, not up or down, but OPPOSITE.  Someone help me out here if I have it wrong.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me it seems like quantum entanglement &#8220;communication&#8221; would be similar if there was a coin flipping machine that flipped a coin inside a box until a button was pressed at which time the state of heads or tails is captured, but not yet known by the observers, the coin is in a heads and tails state, wave function.  Then the machine splits the coin in two, so that heads is one side and tails is on the other, and one half is shipped across the universe.  When my buddy at the other end of the universe opens his box, lets say he sees a tails, then he proudly proclaims he has knowledge faster than light, instaneous, that I have heads. Big Whoop.  That is not communication.  Communication would be if I have an up spin particle, and the entangled is down on the other side of the universe, but I did not want up, so I changed the spin my local particle to down instead, and the particle at the other end of the universe flips up instaneously.  Now we could send info back and forth because the spins would flip opposite.  THAT would be spooky action at a distance.  Unfortunately, the entanglement is broken when I change the spin locally of my particle.  The direction of spin is determined at the creation of the entangled pair, not up or down, but OPPOSITE.  Someone help me out here if I have it wrong.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stephen Ward</title><link>http://calitreview.com/51/comment-page-2#comment-52972</link> <dc:creator>Stephen Ward</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 15:28:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//interviews/the-strange-world-of-quantum-entanglement/#comment-52972</guid> <description>Where would the world be without geeks? The geeks will inherit the world as they are the only one to understand it...
How does the entanglement principle work with the electro magnetic principles?
If the human mind works on this, and the atoms and things that I have no idea about are basically electric and magnetic then surely that copying say the electro-magnetic wave length of the body healing itself could be copied?
Or using the same thing to copy weightlessness would then bombard the cells of something heavy changing the properties making it lighter.
If so then it can be intensified and used as a magic wand to make the cells healthier. Almost like super-oxygenising the blood.
Then the ability to copy, transmit and duplicate could influence the whole spectrum of life as we know it?
Just a thought?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where would the world be without geeks? The geeks will inherit the world as they are the only one to understand it&#8230;</p><p>How does the entanglement principle work with the electro magnetic principles?</p><p>If the human mind works on this, and the atoms and things that I have no idea about are basically electric and magnetic then surely that copying say the electro-magnetic wave length of the body healing itself could be copied?<br
/> Or using the same thing to copy weightlessness would then bombard the cells of something heavy changing the properties making it lighter.</p><p>If so then it can be intensified and used as a magic wand to make the cells healthier. Almost like super-oxygenising the blood.</p><p>Then the ability to copy, transmit and duplicate could influence the whole spectrum of life as we know it?</p><p>Just a thought?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
