<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Abraham Lincoln: A Life by Michael Burlingame</title>
	<atom:link href="http://calitreview.com/5017/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://calitreview.com/5017</link>
	<description>Book reviews, essays, and author interviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:25:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Olga Tarentini</title>
		<link>http://calitreview.com/5017/comment-page-1#comment-70588</link>
		<dc:creator>Olga Tarentini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com/?p=5017#comment-70588</guid>
		<description>A very comprehensive review indeed.  However the question is wouldn&#039;t it have been better if Peter Bridges had written a biography of Abraham Lincoln?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very comprehensive review indeed.  However the question is wouldn&#8217;t it have been better if Peter Bridges had written a biography of Abraham Lincoln?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judith Harris</title>
		<link>http://calitreview.com/5017/comment-page-1#comment-70389</link>
		<dc:creator>Judith Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com/?p=5017#comment-70389</guid>
		<description>Peter Bridges mentions at the outset that the biography is in some ways disappointing, and, as he points out, discussion particularly of the diplomatic missions by a Roman Catholic archbishop, an Anglican bishop and a prominent business leader plainly should have been included, because documented. Nevertheless, despite the omissions Bridges lists, he makes me want to read the book. What a well written and enlightening review - thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter Bridges mentions at the outset that the biography is in some ways disappointing, and, as he points out, discussion particularly of the diplomatic missions by a Roman Catholic archbishop, an Anglican bishop and a prominent business leader plainly should have been included, because documented. Nevertheless, despite the omissions Bridges lists, he makes me want to read the book. What a well written and enlightening review &#8211; thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
