California Literary Review

Hanna Rosin Discusses God’s Harvard

by

October 9th, 2007 at 10:40 am

  • Print Print

Hanna Rosin [Photo by Jona Frank]

Hanna Rosin has covered religion and politics for the Washington Post. She also has written for the New Yorker, the New Republic, GQ, and the New York Times. Her new book, God’s Harvard, is about Patrick Henry College, a Christian school just outside of Washington D.C.

What is Patrick Henry College? How old is it? What is its mission?
Patrick Henry College was founded in the year 2000 by Michael Farris, one of the leaders in the homeschooling movement. The school’s mission is to train the next generation of Christian leaders to “shape the culture and take back the nation,” as they like to say. For the first two years the students follow a Christian liberal arts curriculum, studying many of the classics. For the final two years, they are encouraged to find internships in influential institutions, which could mean the White House, Congress, Hollywood or prominent magazines.
Does the future success of the school depend on Michael Farris or does it have a more solid foundation than the actions of one man?
The school is very tied up with Mike’s vision and his charisma. But it’s already gotten larger than him. At the end of the year I spent there he had already stepped down as president and become chancellor. Now he serves as more ambassador and fundraiser for the school, and tutors a select group of students. He told me that he started out thinking of the students as his 350 children, but that that view was making him crazy. So at some point he has to let go and let it be an institution that operates outside his scrutiny. This year, I’ve heard, they’ve given up on mandatory chapel attendance, which was one of his priorities.
How did you research this book?
In 2005 I spent some time at the school to write a story for the New Yorker magazine. Farris was not unhappy with the story, and agreed to have me spend a year there. I did not live on campus, but I came several days a week, and sometimes spent the night. I also visited students in their homes and went on debate trips with the kids. I tried to choose students and professors with a wide range of views so a reader wouldn’t leave with a Stepford feeling about the school, which doesn’t seem so interesting to me, nor true.
Who are the kids who attend PHC? What is their previous education and how do they differ from students at other elite colleges?
About eighty five percent of students at Patrick Henry were homeschooled. This means their parents opted to teach them at home, usually because they decided the values of the public school were at odds with their own. All the students have to sign a statement of faith which would place them at the conservative side of the Christian evangelical spectrum. On the whole, they tend to be smart, ambitious, and committed to the mission.
Is there a tension between the secular teaching they’re exposed to and their Biblical beliefs? How does that play out?
Tensions often arise between secular teachings and Biblical beliefs. Many students are reading, say Kant and Nietzsche for the first time. They may be alarmed, but they also may find those writers intoxicating. I’ve certainly seen some of the more rebellious students read influential philosophers and then begin to question their beliefs. The school often has a hard time finding a modern novel to teach, because they tend to have a lot of curses, or a nihilistic worldview. In the year I was there the school went through a major intellectual crisis. The administration warred with several of the professors about whether their teaching and writing was consistent with a Biblical worldview, and several of the professors ended up quitting.
When Christian home-schooled students meet the rough-and-tumble world of Washington politics, how do they deal with that psychologically?
This, too can often come as a shock, or at least a surprise to some of the students. They have grown up thinking of the Republican party as their natural home. But then they get out there and see that young Republicans drink and sleep around. On a policy level, they begin to realize that Republicans make compromises, or are not always upright in their personal lives. For some, this leaves them disillusioned with politics. For others, it makes them resolve even more forcefully to be a “light unto the unsaved,” as they would say.
How deeply is an “End Times,” apocalyptic view of the future a part of the students’ belief system? How does this affect their views on topics like global warming or Middle East policy?
Because they are part of a sophisticated new generation of evangelical elites, they don’t tend to talk about this much. They are often disdainful, for example, of the “Left Behind” series of novels. But their home churches very much subscribe to this philosophy. So they usually toe the evangelical party line on those two issues: unquestioning support for Israel, and particularly Israel in its original borders, and resistance to the idea of global warming.
Should we be concerned about a new generation of leaders who are not up-front about the Biblical reasons for the policy decisions they make?
Well that’s part of the reason I wrote this book, to make people aware that the Christian right is not what it used to be. The next generation of leaders will not be as obvious or in your face as the Pat Robertson generation. On the other hand, someone with Patrick Henry on their resume couldn’t exactly hide what they’re all about. And the kids who are really extreme wind up being disillusioned and dropping out of politics.
What has happened to the first graduates of PHC? Are they successfully working their way into positions of power?
The graduates have done remarkably well. A handful work at the White House, and dozens more work for conservative congressmen. They work for think tanks and interest groups all over Washington. A couple are making their way in Hollywood, one very successfully. They’ve gotten decent journalism jobs and the first graduate just got into Harvard Law School. So they have a lot to be proud of.
  • Donna Downing

    My stepfather, a vocal communist during the McCarthy era, rebuilt a ketch from its wooden hull and christened it the ‘Patrick Henry’. It seems all political stripes have their own take on ‘Give me liberty or give me death’. How odd that avowed intellectual aetheist’s beloved sailboat bore the same name as a religious right-wing liberal arts college established to send god-fearing conservative fanatics out into the world to save heathen souls.

  • http://msn.com Butch Krichmar

    What is this remark about crazy trailer trash religious
    nuts? In my opinion anyone that believes in a god is
    a moron.
    This god that you folks believe in creates humanity, destroys it in a flood and then creates an edit that
    states ” Thou shall not kill”.
    organized religion is the evil in this world and you
    can take it to the bank that religion will not save this
    nation, the desolution of religion will save this nation
    and this world.

  • anonymous

    Organized “mythic membership” religion is just a stage of spiritual development, necessary but not sufficient for a mature spiritualty.

    You might find of interest the works of American philosopher, psychologist and mystic Ken Wilber for a conceptual overview that includes and transcends the concrete views of all stripes of fundamentalism.

  • anonymous

    morality can’t be legislated. God Himself NEVER made anyone do anything, that’s why we were created with a will. we as Son’s of God or so called “Christians” are supposed to lead by EXAMPLE…its a shame that so many so called “Christians” are such a poor example but will be 1st to tell you how wrong you are. remember, God is not a rapist…He won’t force anything on anyone, so why do we???

  • Landon

    Butch, I, too, am not really an advocate of organiized religion. However, I have been the cynic and the critic and have been brought to my knees and found much needed, but certainly undeserved grace in the Word of God and my own relationship with Him. Hear me out.

    Based on your statements, I ask you –

    Explain then, the origin of religion and moral structure. Explain the emotional and intellectual differences between humanity and other earth inhabitanting creatures.
    Explain the war and conflict that has consistently rattled the earth from the beginning of human life.
    Explain the pursuit of knowledge, its purpose, and the chief end of organized government and society.
    Define your existence and the fabric within you that comes unraveled when someone breaks your heart.
    Explain the lasting impression of the Bible,
    and historical evidence of the life, love and resurrection of Jesus Christ on history.
    Look into the eyes of an orphan in Russia whose family was murdered by Chechnyan terrorists on her first day of eleventh grade, an orphan who has found fulfillment and healing in the faithful love of God, and tell her that He doesn’t exist. Tell her that she is a moron because, honestly, how possibly could there be a God? She survived purely by chance, her life hasn’t been coordinated by an all knowing King, the peace and joy that sustains her soul is based on a fictitious whim of wishful thinking.

    Study the Bible, sir. Align the bits and pieces by examining the whole; you will find truth and your life WILL change.

    “Human beings, all over the earth, have this curious idea that they ought to behave in a certain way, and can’t really get rid of it.” -C.S. Lewis

    “It is this belief in a power larger than myself and other than myself which allows me to venture into the unknown and even the unknowable.” -Maya Angelou

    Grace to you

  • Tony Pellerito

    The article is about education. The conflict inherent in religious belief is that it filters what you perceive…to fit the belief system, rounding up those square pegs to be pounded into round holes. Rather than spending a lifetime learning, the beliver spends their time sorting through discomfiting facts with a mental cleaver, butchering reality for their godly feast. What they create is a bloody mess. Opening oneself to the endless wonders of the universe is my kind of spiritual. Knowledge is elusive and enthralling. Perhaps the only thing Don Runsfeld had right was that there are things you don’t know you don’t know. When you stretch your mind to comprehend the mearest scrap of which, you are reaching out to touch the face of god.

Get The Latest California Literary Review Updates Delivered Free To Your Inbox!

Powered by FeedBlitz

Recent Comments