<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Gen·e·sis: The Scientific Quest for Life’s Origin by Robert M. Hazen</title> <atom:link href="http://calitreview.com/193/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://calitreview.com/193</link> <description>An arts and culture magazine.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 23:20:18 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: David Loftus</title><link>http://calitreview.com/193/comment-page-1#comment-805</link> <dc:creator>David Loftus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:15:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//2007/05/27/gen%c2%b7e%c2%b7sis-the-scientific-quest-for-life%e2%80%99s-origin-by-robert-m-hazen/#comment-805</guid> <description>As to your first question, the answer is surely no, because of the prohibitive cost and the lack of an answer for what would justify it. Your second question is more intriguing; to my mind, there&#039;s at least one procedural reason (you should learn the &quot;rules&quot; or &quot;guidelines&quot; before you start to monkey with something), and one possibly ethical or even practical one: going beyond mere replication runs the risk a good chunk of the delicately-balanced ecosystem, if not all of it, in a similar way to how the introduction of new species to a closed system like Guam (brown tree snakes) or Australia (don&#039;t jackrabbits come under this heading?) wreaks havoc on the local flora and fauna.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As to your first question, the answer is surely no, because of the prohibitive cost and the lack of an answer for what would justify it. Your second question is more intriguing; to my mind, there&#8217;s at least one procedural reason (you should learn the &#8220;rules&#8221; or &#8220;guidelines&#8221; before you start to monkey with something), and one possibly ethical or even practical one: going beyond mere replication runs the risk a good chunk of the delicately-balanced ecosystem, if not all of it, in a similar way to how the introduction of new species to a closed system like Guam (brown tree snakes) or Australia (don&#8217;t jackrabbits come under this heading?) wreaks havoc on the local flora and fauna.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Abhinav</title><link>http://calitreview.com/193/comment-page-1#comment-804</link> <dc:creator>Abhinav</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:15:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//2007/05/27/gen%c2%b7e%c2%b7sis-the-scientific-quest-for-life%e2%80%99s-origin-by-robert-m-hazen/#comment-804</guid> <description>Hi,
Have we ever tried genetic DNA match between what all the organism have(including cells). Perhaps a common trait can give us a better insight.
Also why do we replicate ie. try to preserve an information (DNA) in the first place ?
Abhinav</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p><p> Have we ever tried genetic DNA match between what all the organism have(including cells). Perhaps a common trait can give us a better insight.<br
/> Also why do we replicate ie. try to preserve an information (DNA) in the first place ?</p><p>Abhinav</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
