<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gen·e·sis: The Scientific Quest for Life’s Origin by Robert M. Hazen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://calitreview.com/193/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://calitreview.com/193</link>
	<description>Book reviews, essays, and author interviews.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:39:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Loftus</title>
		<link>http://calitreview.com/193/comment-page-1#comment-805</link>
		<dc:creator>David Loftus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//2007/05/27/gen%c2%b7e%c2%b7sis-the-scientific-quest-for-life%e2%80%99s-origin-by-robert-m-hazen/#comment-805</guid>
		<description>As to your first question, the answer is surely no, because of the prohibitive cost and the lack of an answer for what would justify it. Your second question is more intriguing; to my mind, there&#039;s at least one procedural reason (you should learn the &quot;rules&quot; or &quot;guidelines&quot; before you start to monkey with something), and one possibly ethical or even practical one: going beyond mere replication runs the risk a good chunk of the delicately-balanced ecosystem, if not all of it, in a similar way to how the introduction of new species to a closed system like Guam (brown tree snakes) or Australia (don&#039;t jackrabbits come under this heading?) wreaks havoc on the local flora and fauna.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As to your first question, the answer is surely no, because of the prohibitive cost and the lack of an answer for what would justify it. Your second question is more intriguing; to my mind, there&#8217;s at least one procedural reason (you should learn the &#8220;rules&#8221; or &#8220;guidelines&#8221; before you start to monkey with something), and one possibly ethical or even practical one: going beyond mere replication runs the risk a good chunk of the delicately-balanced ecosystem, if not all of it, in a similar way to how the introduction of new species to a closed system like Guam (brown tree snakes) or Australia (don&#8217;t jackrabbits come under this heading?) wreaks havoc on the local flora and fauna.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abhinav</title>
		<link>http://calitreview.com/193/comment-page-1#comment-804</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhinav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//2007/05/27/gen%c2%b7e%c2%b7sis-the-scientific-quest-for-life%e2%80%99s-origin-by-robert-m-hazen/#comment-804</guid>
		<description>Hi,

  Have we ever tried genetic DNA match between what all the organism have(including cells). Perhaps a common trait can give us a better insight.
  Also why do we replicate ie. try to preserve an information (DNA) in the first place ?

Abhinav</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>  Have we ever tried genetic DNA match between what all the organism have(including cells). Perhaps a common trait can give us a better insight.<br />
  Also why do we replicate ie. try to preserve an information (DNA) in the first place ?</p>
<p>Abhinav</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
