<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: What If a Large Asteroid Was Heading for Earth?</title> <atom:link href="http://calitreview.com/1714/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://calitreview.com/1714</link> <description>An arts and culture magazine.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:21:58 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: THE PHANTON HELL RIDER</title><link>http://calitreview.com/1714/comment-page-1#comment-86671</link> <dc:creator>THE PHANTON HELL RIDER</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 09:22:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com/?p=1714#comment-86671</guid> <description>CONSTRUCT A POWERFULL LASER BEAN&#039;&#039; THAT CAN PENETRATE&#039;&#039; STONES AND METAL OR AMOR&#039;&#039; THAT CAN TRAVEL BILLIONS OF MILES INTO SPACE&#039;&#039; AND START TO BREAK INTO PEICES NOW. BEFORE IT GETS TO PLANIT EARTH. EARTH IS A PLANIT AND WE ARE FLOATING IN SPACE&#039;&#039; JUST LIKE OTHER PLANITS&#039;&#039;AND SOONER OR LATER&#039;&#039;LIKE OTHER PLANITS WE WILL GET HIT&#039;&#039;BY THEASE ASTEROID&#039;S.OR SEND SPACE SHIPS PREPARED WITH THEASE LASERS.AND START CHOPPING THEN NOW. AND PRAY LIKE HELL.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CONSTRUCT A POWERFULL LASER BEAN&#8221; THAT CAN PENETRATE&#8221; STONES AND METAL OR AMOR&#8221; THAT CAN TRAVEL BILLIONS OF MILES INTO SPACE&#8221; AND START TO BREAK INTO PEICES NOW. BEFORE IT GETS TO PLANIT EARTH. EARTH IS A PLANIT AND WE ARE FLOATING IN SPACE&#8221; JUST LIKE OTHER PLANITS&#8221;AND SOONER OR LATER&#8221;LIKE OTHER PLANITS WE WILL GET HIT&#8221;BY THEASE ASTEROID&#8217;S.OR SEND SPACE SHIPS PREPARED WITH THEASE LASERS.AND START CHOPPING THEN NOW. AND PRAY LIKE HELL.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: IVAN3MAN</title><link>http://calitreview.com/1714/comment-page-1#comment-36676</link> <dc:creator>IVAN3MAN</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:20:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com/?p=1714#comment-36676</guid> <description>cutelilchica: Thanks for the compliment!
Clay: &quot;Marsden Asteroid&quot;? I thought it was over Edmonton, Alberta?
Anyway, according to recent estimates, that fireball had an approximate mass of 10-tonnes and entered the atmosphere at about 14 kilometres/second -- a relatively slow speed, usually meteoroids/asteroids enter the atmosphere at around 20-30 km/s.
Therefore, based on those estimates, its kinetic energy (1/2 * m * v^2) would have been: 9.8 x 10^11 Joules -- equivalent to ~234 tonnes of TNT. However, virtually all of that energy was dissipated in the upper-atmosphere.
If you want some fun simulating asteroid/comet impacts on various targets on the Earth, then click on my name and the link will direct you to the &quot;Impact Calculator&quot; web-site. Enjoy!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cutelilchica: Thanks for the compliment!</p><p>Clay: &#8220;Marsden Asteroid&#8221;? I thought it was over Edmonton, Alberta?</p><p>Anyway, according to recent estimates, that fireball had an approximate mass of 10-tonnes and entered the atmosphere at about 14 kilometres/second &#8212; a relatively slow speed, usually meteoroids/asteroids enter the atmosphere at around 20-30 km/s.</p><p>Therefore, based on those estimates, its kinetic energy (1/2 * m * v^2) would have been: 9.8 x 10^11 Joules &#8212; equivalent to ~234 tonnes of TNT. However, virtually all of that energy was dissipated in the upper-atmosphere.</p><p>If you want some fun simulating asteroid/comet impacts on various targets on the Earth, then click on my name and the link will direct you to the &#8220;Impact Calculator&#8221; web-site. Enjoy!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jason Pollack</title><link>http://calitreview.com/1714/comment-page-1#comment-36635</link> <dc:creator>Jason Pollack</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 01:26:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com/?p=1714#comment-36635</guid> <description>&quot;that’s bigger than Mt. Everest!&quot;
Well yeah, much, much bigger. Everest is only a couple miles wide. The south face rises 8k ft from above the western cwm of the Khumbu glacier on the Nepal side. The slightly taller north face rises 8500 feet above the Rongbuk glacier on the Tibetan Plateau. Much, much larger than Everest are Denali (US) and Mt. Logan (Canada).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;that’s bigger than Mt. Everest!&#8221;</p><p>Well yeah, much, much bigger. Everest is only a couple miles wide. The south face rises 8k ft from above the western cwm of the Khumbu glacier on the Nepal side. The slightly taller north face rises 8500 feet above the Rongbuk glacier on the Tibetan Plateau. Much, much larger than Everest are Denali (US) and Mt. Logan (Canada).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Clay</title><link>http://calitreview.com/1714/comment-page-1#comment-36616</link> <dc:creator>Clay</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:39:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com/?p=1714#comment-36616</guid> <description>Ivan3man.
Calculate us the energy of the &quot;Marsden Asteroid&quot; please.
That would be great to compare Hildebrandt calculations when he writes his paper on his peices he&#039;s co-discovered with his lady researcher,too cool.
&quot;Marsden&quot; must have packed a mighty punch.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ivan3man.<br
/> Calculate us the energy of the &#8220;Marsden Asteroid&#8221; please.<br
/> That would be great to compare Hildebrandt calculations when he writes his paper on his peices he&#8217;s co-discovered with his lady researcher,too cool.</p><p>&#8220;Marsden&#8221; must have packed a mighty punch.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: cutelilchica</title><link>http://calitreview.com/1714/comment-page-1#comment-36604</link> <dc:creator>cutelilchica</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:34:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com/?p=1714#comment-36604</guid> <description>This just amazes me...
Although I&#039;ve read numerous times about the possibilities of an asteroid plummeting towards earth, every time I do, I&#039;m thrown off...
It is so easy to forget how vast of a Universe we are part of, that our planet is just a tiny piece of such a large picture we are unable to grasp fully.
Gravity pulls &amp; all divertion methods... it is all just freakin&#039; amazingly scary and awesome how far humans have advanced in their pursuit to keep us spinning with this earth.
And, IVAN3MAN, you amaze me with your mathematical skills!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just amazes me&#8230;</p><p>Although I&#8217;ve read numerous times about the possibilities of an asteroid plummeting towards earth, every time I do, I&#8217;m thrown off&#8230;</p><p>It is so easy to forget how vast of a Universe we are part of, that our planet is just a tiny piece of such a large picture we are unable to grasp fully.</p><p>Gravity pulls &amp; all divertion methods&#8230; it is all just freakin&#8217; amazingly scary and awesome how far humans have advanced in their pursuit to keep us spinning with this earth.</p><p>And, IVAN3MAN, you amaze me with your mathematical skills!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: IVAN3MAN</title><link>http://calitreview.com/1714/comment-page-1#comment-36541</link> <dc:creator>IVAN3MAN</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:21:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com/?p=1714#comment-36541</guid> <description>Sespetoxri: Don&#039;t worry, I intend to purchase Dr. Phil Plait&#039;s book &quot;Death From The Skies!&quot; in due course. However, I would not count on politicians overcoming their bureaucracy and nationalistic interests in time to provide the necessary funding for a &quot;gravity tug&quot; to be effective.
Alex: Your calculations are somewhat off.
1 tonne of TNT = 4.184 x 10^9 Joules (Source: Wikipedia -- TNT equivalent).
Therefore, the 50Mt yield &quot;Tsar Bomba&quot; would have had an energy equivalent of 2.092 x 10^17 J.
Whereas a 1 tonne projectile, traveling at a velocity of 0.01c (3000 km/s), will have a kinetic energy (1/2 * m * v^2) of 4.5 x 10^15 J -- equivalent to 1Mt of TNT.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sespetoxri: Don&#8217;t worry, I intend to purchase Dr. Phil Plait&#8217;s book &#8220;Death From The Skies!&#8221; in due course. However, I would not count on politicians overcoming their bureaucracy and nationalistic interests in time to provide the necessary funding for a &#8220;gravity tug&#8221; to be effective.</p><p>Alex: Your calculations are somewhat off.</p><p>1 tonne of TNT = 4.184 x 10^9 Joules (Source: Wikipedia &#8212; TNT equivalent).</p><p>Therefore, the 50Mt yield &#8220;Tsar Bomba&#8221; would have had an energy equivalent of 2.092 x 10^17 J.</p><p>Whereas a 1 tonne projectile, traveling at a velocity of 0.01c (3000 km/s), will have a kinetic energy (1/2 * m * v^2) of 4.5 x 10^15 J &#8212; equivalent to 1Mt of TNT.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alex</title><link>http://calitreview.com/1714/comment-page-1#comment-36511</link> <dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:52:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com/?p=1714#comment-36511</guid> <description>Alan: Actually, a 50MT nuclear blast (comparable to the largest ever detonated) is about 1.25*10^15J, while a 1T object traveling at 0.01c is more than 4 times that.  Yes, that&#039;s fast, but it&#039;s not unattainable (especially in a civilization saving situation).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan: Actually, a 50MT nuclear blast (comparable to the largest ever detonated) is about 1.25*10^15J, while a 1T object traveling at 0.01c is more than 4 times that.  Yes, that&#8217;s fast, but it&#8217;s not unattainable (especially in a civilization saving situation).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alan</title><link>http://calitreview.com/1714/comment-page-1#comment-36501</link> <dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:14:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com/?p=1714#comment-36501</guid> <description>&quot;... we may have to launch a rocket at the thing and simply smash into it – the energy of impact is actually far larger than the detonation of a nuclear weapon.&quot;  That is not quite an accurate statement.  A nuclear weapon has much more energy, but the impactor delivers more momentum.  It&#039;s momentum that changes the course of an asteroid, not raw energy.  Coupling the nuclear blast energy to produce momentum recoil of the asteroid is the hard part.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230; we may have to launch a rocket at the thing and simply smash into it – the energy of impact is actually far larger than the detonation of a nuclear weapon.&#8221;  That is not quite an accurate statement.  A nuclear weapon has much more energy, but the impactor delivers more momentum.  It&#8217;s momentum that changes the course of an asteroid, not raw energy.  Coupling the nuclear blast energy to produce momentum recoil of the asteroid is the hard part.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sespetoxri</title><link>http://calitreview.com/1714/comment-page-1#comment-36483</link> <dc:creator>Sespetoxri</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 15:28:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com/?p=1714#comment-36483</guid> <description>To Ivan:
The &#039;Gravity Tug&#039; concept isn&#039;t really all that new, it&#039;s been talked about for a long time.  It really is the only reasonable way on the table right now to keep a large rock from hitting us.  If you read Phil&#039;s book, he talks about it in great detail and far more eloquently than me.
But, if you boil it down to the basics- everything has gravity.  If you have a 20 ton rock and a 1 ton probe, they affect one another.  If the probe flys next to the asteroid and begins to pulse it&#039;s engines in the direction we want the asteroid to go.  If the rock is five years from hitting us even a small change in it&#039;s trajectory will ensure it misses us when it finally gets to the point in space where we intersect.
If the asteroid is bearing down on us and a few weeks from impact, you&#039;re right- you&#039;d need something of equal or greater mass than the asteroid to make a difference.  But when they&#039;re far far away from hitting, you don&#039;t need much to make the changes necessary to keep it from impacting.
The issue at hand, obviously, is spotting it early enough.
Grab a copy of Phil&#039;s book - he explains it far better than me.  And, as a bonus, you get all the other fun stuff he writes about!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Ivan:</p><p>The &#8216;Gravity Tug&#8217; concept isn&#8217;t really all that new, it&#8217;s been talked about for a long time.  It really is the only reasonable way on the table right now to keep a large rock from hitting us.  If you read Phil&#8217;s book, he talks about it in great detail and far more eloquently than me.</p><p>But, if you boil it down to the basics- everything has gravity.  If you have a 20 ton rock and a 1 ton probe, they affect one another.  If the probe flys next to the asteroid and begins to pulse it&#8217;s engines in the direction we want the asteroid to go.  If the rock is five years from hitting us even a small change in it&#8217;s trajectory will ensure it misses us when it finally gets to the point in space where we intersect.</p><p>If the asteroid is bearing down on us and a few weeks from impact, you&#8217;re right- you&#8217;d need something of equal or greater mass than the asteroid to make a difference.  But when they&#8217;re far far away from hitting, you don&#8217;t need much to make the changes necessary to keep it from impacting.</p><p>The issue at hand, obviously, is spotting it early enough.</p><p>Grab a copy of Phil&#8217;s book &#8211; he explains it far better than me.  And, as a bonus, you get all the other fun stuff he writes about!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: IVAN3MAN</title><link>http://calitreview.com/1714/comment-page-1#comment-36481</link> <dc:creator>IVAN3MAN</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:35:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com/?p=1714#comment-36481</guid> <description>I must say that I am skeptical of the effectiveness of a &quot;gravity tug&quot;. It may work on low density asteroids/comets of up to 100 metres across, but a large rocky Asteroid -- a 200 metres wide asteroid, composed of dense, rock will have a mass of approximately 16-17 million tonnes -- is going to require a gravitational tractor of some considerable mass to have any significant effect on its trajectory. Furthermore, it&#039;s going to take some considerable effort to launch that huge &#039;dead&#039; mass into space.
I think that a more effective proposition would be a Kinetic Impactor --  a means of deflecting an asteroid by attempting to directly alter its momentum by sending a spacecraft to collide with the asteroid. Deflection could be achieved with a small mass of &lt;1 tonne up to 10 tonnes to impact against the asteroid, depending on its size.
The European Space Agency is already studying the preliminary design of a space mission able to demonstrate this futuristic technology. The mission, named Don Quijote, is the first real asteroid deflection mission ever designed. During a trade-off study, one of the leading researchers argued that a strategy called &quot;kinetic impactor deflection&quot; was more efficient than others.
For more information, check out &quot;Asteroid Deflection Strategies&quot; in Wikipedia.
Well, that&#039;s my two cents&#039; worth.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say that I am skeptical of the effectiveness of a &#8220;gravity tug&#8221;. It may work on low density asteroids/comets of up to 100 metres across, but a large rocky Asteroid &#8212; a 200 metres wide asteroid, composed of dense, rock will have a mass of approximately 16-17 million tonnes &#8212; is going to require a gravitational tractor of some considerable mass to have any significant effect on its trajectory. Furthermore, it&#8217;s going to take some considerable effort to launch that huge &#8216;dead&#8217; mass into space.</p><p>I think that a more effective proposition would be a Kinetic Impactor &#8212;  a means of deflecting an asteroid by attempting to directly alter its momentum by sending a spacecraft to collide with the asteroid. Deflection could be achieved with a small mass of &lt;1 tonne up to 10 tonnes to impact against the asteroid, depending on its size.</p><p>The European Space Agency is already studying the preliminary design of a space mission able to demonstrate this futuristic technology. The mission, named Don Quijote, is the first real asteroid deflection mission ever designed. During a trade-off study, one of the leading researchers argued that a strategy called &#8220;kinetic impactor deflection&#8221; was more efficient than others.</p><p>For more information, check out &#8220;Asteroid Deflection Strategies&#8221; in Wikipedia.</p><p>Well, that&#8217;s my two cents&#8217; worth.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Clay</title><link>http://calitreview.com/1714/comment-page-1#comment-36479</link> <dc:creator>Clay</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:17:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com/?p=1714#comment-36479</guid> <description>I saw the Marsden Asteroid that just recently struck up here in Saskatchewan.
The entire event from start to finish...it was incredible.
What I witnessed no force on Earth could stop and the dark evening was lit up like the day.If you catch them before earth&#039;s gravity-well you might get a chance to nudge them away.
Once they are drawn down towards us you are a captive audience and powerless.
Thanx-Clay</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw the Marsden Asteroid that just recently struck up here in Saskatchewan.<br
/> The entire event from start to finish&#8230;it was incredible.</p><p>What I witnessed no force on Earth could stop and the dark evening was lit up like the day.If you catch them before earth&#8217;s gravity-well you might get a chance to nudge them away.<br
/> Once they are drawn down towards us you are a captive audience and powerless.<br
/> Thanx-Clay</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jehanne zeidan</title><link>http://calitreview.com/1714/comment-page-1#comment-36472</link> <dc:creator>jehanne zeidan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 11:52:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com/?p=1714#comment-36472</guid> <description>&quot;such rocks and a space program that we can use to prevent them from hitting us&quot;.This is so impressive what Human can do to stay alive and survive.But i am interesting to know more about th space eprogram.its astonishing how in the late future will be able may be to change the condiguration of the universe!!!!heheheheh why not nthing is impossible for the human being who wants to survive.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;such rocks and a space program that we can use to prevent them from hitting us&#8221;.This is so impressive what Human can do to stay alive and survive.But i am interesting to know more about th space eprogram.its astonishing how in the late future will be able may be to change the condiguration of the universe!!!!heheheheh why not nthing is impossible for the human being who wants to survive.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Larian LeQuella</title><link>http://calitreview.com/1714/comment-page-1#comment-36452</link> <dc:creator>Larian LeQuella</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 02:28:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com/?p=1714#comment-36452</guid> <description>I encourage your readers to pick up the book itself and read it.  This interview is just a taste of Dr. Plait&#039;s style.  It&#039;s infectiously fun!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I encourage your readers to pick up the book itself and read it.  This interview is just a taste of Dr. Plait&#8217;s style.  It&#8217;s infectiously fun!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
