<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Marriage, A History: From Obedience to Intimacy, or How Love Conquered Marriage</title> <atom:link href="http://calitreview.com/139/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://calitreview.com/139</link> <description>An arts and culture magazine.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:21:58 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: David Loftus</title><link>http://calitreview.com/139/comment-page-1#comment-97967</link> <dc:creator>David Loftus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 22:56:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//non-fiction-reviews/marriage-a-history-from-obedience-to-intimacy-or-how-love-conquered-marriage/#comment-97967</guid> <description>I suppose it depends on how one defines &quot;happiness,&quot; Bruce. Your assertion that a nihilistic and narcissistic (note those critical modifiers, everyone) march toward personal happiness is a sure path to chaos suggests to me that your argument assumes personal happiness is based on collection and consumption of goodies. But what if one finds that one&#039;s personal happiness lies in fufilling a life partner&#039;s desires and goals? In voluntary service to others? In rejection of nonstop participation in consumer culture? I don&#039;t see any of this as being inherently dependent upon Christian -- or any other religious or spiritual -- values.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose it depends on how one defines &#8220;happiness,&#8221; Bruce. Your assertion that a nihilistic and narcissistic (note those critical modifiers, everyone) march toward personal happiness is a sure path to chaos suggests to me that your argument assumes personal happiness is based on collection and consumption of goodies. But what if one finds that one&#8217;s personal happiness lies in fufilling a life partner&#8217;s desires and goals? In voluntary service to others? In rejection of nonstop participation in consumer culture? I don&#8217;t see any of this as being inherently dependent upon Christian &#8212; or any other religious or spiritual &#8212; values.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bruce</title><link>http://calitreview.com/139/comment-page-1#comment-23230</link> <dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 19:06:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//non-fiction-reviews/marriage-a-history-from-obedience-to-intimacy-or-how-love-conquered-marriage/#comment-23230</guid> <description>Seems to me the biggest oversight in Coontz&#039;s appraisal of Western marriage is the importance (past/present/and future) of a spiritual understanding of marriage.
Granted, she is a researcher, but she gives little to no credence to the fact that what she calls the 1950&#039;s model of marriage is inextricably indebted to Christian ideals: Love as the greatest virtue; a covenant vs. a contract; the very notion that every individual life is significant....et. al.
She says this has been deconstructed by people who want personal happiness.
If anything is going to save marriage - perhaps even society - it&#039;s going to be the acceptance - or return to - the belief that our pleasure in this world is not the sole measure of our life&#039;s worth.
Certainly, we should not return to the inequality and misogyny of the past, but a nihilistic and narcissistic march toward &quot;personal happiness&quot;- whatever that is - and wherever it leads, is a sure path to chaos.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me the biggest oversight in Coontz&#8217;s appraisal of Western marriage is the importance (past/present/and future) of a spiritual understanding of marriage.<br
/> Granted, she is a researcher, but she gives little to no credence to the fact that what she calls the 1950&#8242;s model of marriage is inextricably indebted to Christian ideals: Love as the greatest virtue; a covenant vs. a contract; the very notion that every individual life is significant&#8230;.et. al.<br
/> She says this has been deconstructed by people who want personal happiness.<br
/> If anything is going to save marriage &#8211; perhaps even society &#8211; it&#8217;s going to be the acceptance &#8211; or return to &#8211; the belief that our pleasure in this world is not the sole measure of our life&#8217;s worth.<br
/> Certainly, we should not return to the inequality and misogyny of the past, but a nihilistic and narcissistic march toward &#8220;personal happiness&#8221;- whatever that is &#8211; and wherever it leads, is a sure path to chaos.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Loftus</title><link>http://calitreview.com/139/comment-page-1#comment-18307</link> <dc:creator>David Loftus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 00:09:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//non-fiction-reviews/marriage-a-history-from-obedience-to-intimacy-or-how-love-conquered-marriage/#comment-18307</guid> <description>Errr . . . perhaps &quot;Jocelyn?&quot; could be a little more specific? Who are you asking? Judge what?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Errr . . . perhaps &#8220;Jocelyn?&#8221; could be a little more specific? Who are you asking? Judge what?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jocelyn?</title><link>http://calitreview.com/139/comment-page-1#comment-1420</link> <dc:creator>Jocelyn?</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 00:25:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//non-fiction-reviews/marriage-a-history-from-obedience-to-intimacy-or-how-love-conquered-marriage/#comment-1420</guid> <description>who are YOU to judge???!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who are YOU to judge???!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jocelyn Morin</title><link>http://calitreview.com/139/comment-page-1#comment-713</link> <dc:creator>Jocelyn Morin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 17:19:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://calitreview.com//non-fiction-reviews/marriage-a-history-from-obedience-to-intimacy-or-how-love-conquered-marriage/#comment-713</guid> <description>This lucid review with startling revelations, some from the time of the ancient Greeks, reached through the generations and grabbed me. I&#039;m looking forward to reading the book.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This lucid review with startling revelations, some from the time of the ancient Greeks, reached through the generations and grabbed me. I&#8217;m looking forward to reading the book.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
